Glycemic Effects of a Low-Carbohydrate Enteral Formula Compared With an Enteral Formula of Standard Composition in Critically Ill Patients: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial > 2018

본문 바로가기

접속자집계

오늘
1,648
전체
2,137,842
TEL:02-3789-7891
사이트 내 전체검색

Home >
2018

Glycemic Effects of a Low-Carbohydrate Enteral Formula Compared With a…

작성자 채식영양
작성일 18-01-01 00:00 | 조회 0 | 댓글 0

본문

SC. van Steen, S. Rijkenberg, MK. Sechterberger, JH. DeVries and PHJ. van der Voort (2018). Glycemic Effects of a Low-Carbohydrate Enteral Formula Compared With an Enteral Formula of Standard Composition in Critically Ill Patients: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 42(6), 1035-1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1045

PubMed 30133840


[Abstract]
BACKGROUND: Enteral low-carbohydrate formulas (LCFs) could serve as a noninsulin alternative for the treatment of stress hyperglycemia in critically ill patients. We compared the glycemic effects of an LCF with a standard formula.

METHODS: We conducted an open-label randomized trial in patients admitted to our intensive care unit between September 2015 and June 2016. Adult patients with an indication for enteral nutrition were randomized to an LCF (Glucerna 1.5 kcal) or a standard enteral formula (Fresubin Energy Fibre, with additional protein supplement). Primary outcome was glucose variability defined as mean absolute glucose (MAG) change (mmol/L/h). Secondary outcomes were mean glucose, time in target, hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events, and insulin requirements. We assessed glycemic outcomes per blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system and compared outcomes with glucose measurements per blood gas analysis and point-of-care device.

RESULTS: We randomized 107 patients (LCF: n = 53; standard: n = 54). Six patients had no CGM data, leaving 101 patients (n = 52; n = 49) for the intention-to-treat analysis. MAG change and time in target range were not different between groups. LCF gave a lower mean glucose measured per point-of-care device (7.8 ± 1.0 vs 8.4 ± 1.1 mmol/L, P = .007). LCF patients required significantly less insulin on the second study day (46.8 vs 68.0 IU, P = .036).

CONCLUSION: LCF showed a trend toward a modestly reduced mean glucose and significantly lower insulin requirements as compared with standard feeding but had no effect on glucose variability or time in target range.

0
  • 페이스북으로 보내기
  • 트위터로 보내기
  • 구글플러스로 보내기

댓글목록 0

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

Total 232
2018 목록
번호 제목 글쓴이 날짜 조회 추천
7 텍스트 Mechanisms of action for the medium-chain triglyceride ketog… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
6 텍스트 The interpretation and effect of a low-carbohydrate diet in … 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
5 텍스트 Questionnaire survey on the current status of ketogenic diet… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
4 텍스트 Efficacy of a ketogenic diet with concomitant intranasal per… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
3 텍스트 Ketogenic parenteral nutrition in 17 pediatric patients with… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
2 텍스트 Feasibility and efficacy data from a ketogenic diet interven… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
열람중 텍스트 Glycemic Effects of a Low-Carbohydrate Enteral Formula Compa… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
게시물 검색

한국채식정보. 대표:이광조ㅣsoypaper@hanmail.netㅣ대표전화: 02-3789-7891ㅣ서울시 용산구 갈월동 56-5. 일심빌딩 203호