Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Among Patients Treated With Intravenous vs Subcutaneous Insulin for Diabetic Ketoacidosis > 2025

본문 바로가기

접속자집계

오늘
1,648
전체
2,137,842
TEL:02-3789-7891
사이트 내 전체검색

Home >
2025

Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Among Patients Treated With Intrave…

작성자 채식영양
작성일 25-01-01 00:00 | 조회 0 | 댓글 0

본문

RT. Griffey, RM. Schneider, M. Girardi, G. LaRossa, J. Yeary, M. Lehmkuhl, D. Suarez, R. Ancona, T. Kaser, et al. (2025). Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Among Patients Treated With Intravenous vs Subcutaneous Insulin for Diabetic Ketoacidosis. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 6(1), 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100020

PubMed 40012662


[Abstract]
OBJECTIVES: We previously implemented the subcutaneous (SQ) insulin in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (SQuID) protocol, demonstrating safe, effective treatment of low to moderate (LTM) severity DKA in a non-intensive care unit setting. SQuID replaces intravenous (IV) insulin with SQ injections and reduces glucose checks from hourly to every 2 hours. We are not aware of any data on patient satisfaction with treatment in DKA. Our objective was to compare satisfaction in patients treated with IV insulin to that in patients treated with the SQ protocol.

METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in an urban academic hospital (March 2023 to March 2024) of emergency department patients treated for LTM DKA with SQ or IV insulin. Patients were contacted by phone in the hospital after the resolution of DKA. We used the validated 21-item Diabetic Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-Inpatient tool (DTSQ-IP) using 7-tier Likert-style options (0 = negative; 6 = positive) to assess patient satisfaction with treatment. We computed the DTSQ-IP composite treatment satisfaction score (using 15 of the 21 items), assessing differences between groups.

RESULTS: Of the 60 patients contacted, 52 (87%) completed the questionnaire. Median DTSQ-IP satisfaction scores for SQuID and IV insulin patients were 86.0 (IQR, 79.0, 88.0) and 81.0 (IQR, 77.0, 88.0), respectively. We found no difference in satisfaction between groups (difference 5.0; 95% CI, -3.0, 10.0).

CONCLUSION: In this single-center study, patient satisfaction with DKA care was high, with no differences observed between patients treated with SQ vs IV insulin protocols. This is the first study we are aware of on patient satisfaction with treatment in DKA or treatment with SQ insulin. Though the sample size is small, these findings suggest that patient satisfaction should not represent a barrier to the implementation of SQ protocols for LTM severity DKA.

0
  • 페이스북으로 보내기
  • 트위터로 보내기
  • 구글플러스로 보내기

댓글목록 0

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

Total 437
2025 목록
번호 제목 글쓴이 날짜 조회 추천
392 텍스트 Association of Diabetic Ketoacidosis at Onset, Diabetes Tech… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
391 텍스트 Determination of Urine Netrin-1 and Beta-Hydroxy Butyrate Le… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
390 텍스트 Preoperative SGLT2 Inhibitor Use and Postoperative Diabetic … 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
389 텍스트 Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis: Rising incidence, diagnost… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
388 텍스트 Hyperthyroidism-Induced Nondiabetic Ketoacidosis: A Rare Cas… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
387 텍스트 Revisiting Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) Fluid Management: Sho… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
386 텍스트 An elderly patient with dementia presenting euglycaemic keto… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
385 텍스트 Clinicopathologic Appearance of Advanced Ketoacidosis With B… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
384 텍스트 Illnesses associated with ketosis including diabetic ketoaci… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
383 텍스트 Relationship Between Inflammatory Markers (IL-6, Neutrophil-… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
382 텍스트 Diabetic Ketoacidosis and the Use of New Hypoglycemic Groups… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
381 텍스트 Choice of Intravenous Fluid for Resuscitation in Diabetic Ke… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
열람중 텍스트 Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Among Patients Treated Wi… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
379 텍스트 Diabetic Ketoacidosis Caused by Acute Pancreatitis Results i… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
378 텍스트 Managing Acute Esophageal Necrosis Secondary to Diabetic Ket… 링크 채식영양 01-01 1 0
게시물 검색

한국채식정보. 대표:이광조ㅣsoypaper@hanmail.netㅣ대표전화: 02-3789-7891ㅣ서울시 용산구 갈월동 56-5. 일심빌딩 203호